Lists – Fruit of the Spirit for Example
June 8, 2011
Here is Galatians 5:22-23
22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law.
It is tempting to pull out a concordance or to check all the cross references on the 9 words listed. However it is better to first look at the passage in context
Several important factors
- In general Paul is contrasting life in the spirit with life in the flesh (or “sinful human nature”).
- This list is surrounded by a longer list of “works of the Flesh” which appear to be quite random.
- Note that the passage talks of “Love” in three important ways.
- Love is the first fruit,
- Gal 5:6 “what is important is faith expressing itself in love”
- Gal 5:13 “…rather serve one another in love.”
- Both sets of words are interpersonal – that is they are not so much innate qualities, but how we act well or poorly towards others. (see note on “Love”, as well as v. 15, 26 which speak of interpersonal conflicts.)
- Slavery is associated with selfishness and freedom with service – contrary to popular opinion.
- Fruit are the desired and intended result of a plant – hence these are the desired and intended result for those who have found their freedom in Christ.
- The Fruit are 9, some see groups of 3 – I am not convinced.
- love, joy, peace – more God ward
- patience, kindness, goodness – other focus
- faithfulness, gentleness, self-control – self focus
- It is hard to teach on a single word, so let the context help focus what supplemental scriptures enlighten this passage.
- Finally, a coffee shop, a manuscript and colored pencils are what were required to assemble these thoughts..
Weighing the options – Ephesians 1:11
October 22, 2010
Sometimes we find passages where the translations and the commentators can not agree. In Ephesians 1:11 we find the aorist passive 1st person plural form of klēroō.
This verb is used only once in the New Testament, thus it is a hapax legomena - a word used only once in the written record. This makes the translation difficult.
It means literally “our lot was cast.” In comparison to its cognates, the word has to do with lots, destiny, being chosen and inheritance. Two Old Testament usages are cited. Israel is sometimes called God’s possession -
Deut. 32:9
But the Lord’s portion is his people,
Jacob his allotted heritage.
Yet it can also refer to the portions of land that were given to the tribes if Israel after the conquest. This is commanded in
Numbers 26:55-56
But the land shall be divided by lot. According to the names of the tribes of their fathers they shall inherit. [56] Their inheritance shall be divided according to lot between the larger and the smaller.”
And the process of this division by lot is described in Joshua 14 – 19. Each tribe received title to a portion of land that was theirs to enter in and take possession.
So the commentators and translations split – those opting for the translation that we are God’s portion cite the grammar, while those choosing that we receive an inheritance cite the context – especially verse 14.
One translation (RSV) seems to skip the whole thing!
In seminary the joke was that if you put all the commentaries who chose position A on one side of a scale and those choosing position B on the other, you could pick the “heaviest” choice.
We prefer to go with the context. In reading this section, Ephesians 1:3-14, it seems that words like choosing and electing are tied with benefits to us.
v. 4 – Chosen – to be holy and blameless
v. 5 – Predestined – for adoption
v. 11 – Predestined – for an inheritance
v. 13,14 – Holy Spirit – guarantee of our inheritance
V. 14 has the noun form of the verb (klēronomia) and is translated as “inheritance” or “salvation”.
In general, we prefer to go with the context over the dictionary alone – as words have a range of meaning (semantic field) that is made specific by how it is used.
So we have received an inheritance according to God’s eternal plan (v. 11) which is sealed or guaranteed by the Holy Spirit to the believer (v. 14).
For the content of this inhertiance…well, the sermon is yet to be preached, drop by Bethany EFC in Madison, WI and see what one FRESH READ might be.
Otherwise, ponder this:
Psalm 16:6 ESV
The lines have fallen for me in pleasant places;
indeed, I have a beautiful inheritance.
Habakkuk 2:4 – A Case for Context
October 26, 2009
The interpretation of Habakkuk 2:4 is a case in point of reading a verse in the context of its book. the Book is in three chapters. Chapter 1 is a dialogue between the Prophet and God over the sad state of Israel in the 7th Century BCE. When the Lord tells the Prophet that his instrument of correction is the Babylonian Empire, the Prophet has a fit! He says that he will stand on the ramparts and wait for an answer.
The answer comes and it is verse 4.
Habakkuk 2:4
“Behold, his soul is puffed up; it is not upright within him,
but the righteous shall live by his faith.
The exegetical arguments are often whether this verse proves the theological point of Justification by Faith – since it is tied to Romans 1:16-17.
If one reads this a the turning point of the book, then we see that v. 4a, the part about Babylon (“he is puffed up”) is explained in the remainder of chapter 2 with 5 “woes” or words of prophetic judgment. yes, God will use Babylon, but he will also hold them accountable for their excesses.
Then if one reads chapter 3, it is the prophet’s prayer/hymn to the Lord – in it he expresses faith -
Habakkuk 3:2
O Lord, I have heard the report of you,
and your work, O Lord, do I fear.
In the midst of the years revive it;
in the midst of the years make it known;
in wrath remember mercy.
Habakkuk 3:17-19
Though the fig tree should not blossom,
nor fruit be on the vines,
the produce of the olive fail
and the fields yield no food,
the flock be cut off from the fold
and there be no herd in the stalls,
[18] yet I will rejoice in the Lord;
I will take joy in the God of my salvation.
[19] God, the Lord, is my strength;
he makes my feet like the deer’s;
he makes me tread on my high places.
So it seems that the righteous live by faith in God, not in their own goodness or strength, whereas the puffed up live in confidence and trust in themselves and their power. Faith is contrasted with arrogance, self-trust and violence. Faith is based on what is promised, not what is actually seen.
so the application of “the just shall live by faith” in the New Testament passages of Romans 1:16-17, Galatians 3:11 and Hebrews 10:38 make particular applications of that general principle. Romans says it well, that the righteousness of God is “from faith for faith” or “from faith from first to last.”
That is the start, the middle and the end are lived by faith, not self-confidence, not confidence in what is seen or touched or experienced, but in God who speaks truthfully.

